and pdfThursday, June 3, 2021 1:49:02 AM4

Searle Proper Names And Intentionality Pdf

searle proper names and intentionality pdf

File Name: searle proper names and intentionality .zip
Size: 15440Kb
Published: 03.06.2021

There is a fairly general consensus that names are Millian or Russellian genuine terms, that is, are singular terms whose sole semantic function is to introduce a referent into the propositions expressed by sentences containing the term. This answers the question as to what sort of proposition is expressed by use of sentences containing names. But there is a second serious semantic problem about proper names, that of how the referents of proper names are determined. This is the question that I will discuss in this paper.


In philosophy, intentionality is the power of minds and mental states to be about, to represent, or to stand for, things, properties and states of affairs. Furthermore, to the extent that a speaker utters words from some natural language or draws pictures or symbols from a formal language for the purpose of conveying to others the contents of her mental states, these artifacts used by a speaker too have contents or intentionality. A picture of a dog, a proper name e. A complete thought, a full sentence or a picture can stand for or describe a state of affairs. How could some of the represented things e.

Searle on Proper Names and Intentionality

John R. Searle is one of the world's leading philosophers. During his long and outstanding career, he has made groundbreaking and lasting contributions to the philosophy of language, to the philosophy of mind, as well as to the nature, structure, and functioning of social reality. EN English Deutsch. Your documents are now available to view.

searle proper names and intentionality pdf

Searle: “Proper Names and Intentionality”. Searle's Account Of The Problem. In this essay, Searle emphasizes the notion of 'Intentional content'.

Chapter 7: The Contemporary Descriptivist Theory of Reference

Skip to main content Skip to table of contents. Advertisement Hide. This service is more advanced with JavaScript available.

This book deals with the main proponents of the causal and descriptivist reference theories on natural kind terms. The two main types of contemporary reference theories on natural kind terms are the causal and the descriptivist theories. The author analyzes the main versions of these two types of theories and claims that the differences between them are not as great as it is usually assumed. He alleges that the ostensive reference fixing and reference borrowing theories should be descriptive-causal, and he also adduces that the relation of kind-identity depends on the views on kind-identity and thus involves descriptive elements.

John Searle

Christopher Hurtado. How names refer to objects has been a perennial problem in the philosophy of language. The descriptivist account has long prevailed. But is it correct? Before Kripke came along and attacked it, many philosophers thought it was.

He was Willis S. Widely noted for his contributions to the philosophy of language , philosophy of mind , and social philosophy , he began teaching at UC Berkeley in In the late s, Searle challenged the restrictions of Berkeley's rent stabilization ordinance. Following what came to be known as the California Supreme Court's "Searle Decision" of , Berkeley changed its rent control policy, leading to large rent increases between and Searle's early work on speech acts , influenced by J.

In the philosophy of language , the descriptivist theory of proper names also descriptivist theory of reference [1] is the view that the meaning or semantic content of a proper name is identical to the descriptions associated with it by speakers, while their referents are determined to be the objects that satisfy these descriptions. Bertrand Russell and Gottlob Frege have both been associated with the descriptivist theory, which is sometimes called the Frege—Russell view. In the s, this theory came under attack from causal theorists such as Saul Kripke , Hilary Putnam and others. However, it has seen something of a revival in recent years, especially under the form of what are called two-dimensional semantic theories. This latter trend is exemplified by the theories of David Chalmers , among others. A simple descriptivist theory of names can be thought of as follows: for every proper name p , there is some collection of descriptions D associated with p that constitute the meaning of p.

INTENTIONALITY*. BY. JOHN R. SEARLE. I. The Nature of the Problem. The problem of proper names ought to be easy, and at one level I think it is: we need to.

Стратмор кивнул: - Это наименьшая из наших проблем. - Не можем ли мы подкупить Танкадо. Я знаю, он нас ненавидит, но что, если предложить ему несколько миллионов долларов. Убедить не выпускать этот шифр из рук.


Последний шанс. Но мы его упустили. - Не могу с ним не согласиться, - заметил Фонтейн.  - Сомневаюсь, что Танкадо пошел бы на риск, дав нам возможность угадать ключ к шифру-убийце.

Understanding proper names


  1. Gustav V.

    06.06.2021 at 02:55

    Vocabulary cartoons building an educated vocabulary with visual mnemonics pdf line and rotational symmetry pdf

  2. Yseult B.

    06.06.2021 at 15:18

    Collective intentionality is of central importance in social ontology.

  3. Bill H.

    11.06.2021 at 00:26

    Skip to main content Skip to table of contents.

  4. Kruseningu

    12.06.2021 at 08:06

    The awkward path to getting lucky pdf free the economics of money banking and financial markets pdf free download

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *